Legal Opinion

Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 31, 1955No. 58897; protest 214544-K (Portland, Oreg.)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

This is a protest against the collector’s assessment of duty on a bale of wool (bale No. 16), which it is claimed was never received by the importer.

At the trial, there was received in evidence the official file, which the collector forwarded to the court. According to these papers, 11 bales of wool were shipped from Australia and entered for warehouse at the port of Portland, Oreg., on or about April 15, 1952. The inspector’s report on the back of the warehouse permit states that bales numbered 16 and 17 were short shipped and that bale No. 17 arrived on May 1,1952, having…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Borgfeldt & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  2. United States v. BrownCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. Ungerer & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  4. Washington State Liquor Control Board v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Trading Co. of Afghanistan, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API