Legal Opinion

Pastene & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 16, 1955No. 59581; protests 195663-K, 203770-K, 203774-K, and 203777-K (Boston)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

In these cases, consolidated at the trial, it is claimed that duty was assessed upon excess quantities of the merchandise, olive oil in tins; that the determination of weight for duty purposes was erroneous; that allowances in duty should have been made in respect to portions of the merchandise found not to have been landed. At the trial, counsel referred only to the claim that allowances for shortages, reported by the customs inspector, should have been made. All other claims are deemed abandoned.

Counsel made the following statements at the hearing:

Me. Ziegel: * * *

I offer to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. BrownCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. Ungerer & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  3. Washington State Liquor Control Board v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  4. Unanue & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API