Legal Opinion

Washington Fidelity National Ins. v. Herbert

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1932No. 23510PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The charge requested in writing to .be given before argument is conceded to be a correct statement of the law, pertinent to an issue in the case and the facts embodied therein supported by competent evidence.

The provisions of the statute, Section 11447, General Code, that a requested instruction meeting the above requirements shall be given to the jury prior to argument, are mandatory. This principle has been announced in numerous cases, in which it has been further declared that the error of refusing to give such requested charge before argument is not cured by giving the same instruction in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lima Used Car Exchange Co. v. HemperlyOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Bartson v. CraigOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Cincinnati Traction Co. v. KrogerOhio Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Smith v. FlesherOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Astorhurst Land Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Bradley v. Mansfield Rapid Transit, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Mikula v. TailorsOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Pallini v. DankowskiOhio Supreme Court · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API