Lima Used Car Exchange Co. v. Hemperly
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
The record discloses that upon the conclusion of all the testimony in the case the plaintiff in error, defendant below, submitted to the court four propositions of law, in writing, which it requested should be given to the jury by the court before argument, pursuant to Section 11447, paragraph 5, General Code, which provides: “When the evidence is concluded, either party may present written instructions to the court on. matters of law, and request them to be given to the jury, which instructions shall be given or refused by the court before the argument to the jury is commenced.”
The fourth…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Schell v. DuBoisOhio Supreme Court · 1916
- Murphy v. HawthorneOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Commonwealth v. HenryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Stroud v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Jaquith v. WordenWashington Supreme Court · 1913
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Mikula v. TailorsOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- Simko v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. StantonOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- Bartson v. CraigOhio Supreme Court · 1929
- Karnes v. Ace Cab CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.