Alexsam, Inc. v. Idt Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge DYK.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge MAYER.
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Defendant IDT Corporation appeals from the judgment of the District Court for the Eastern District of Texas determining that certain of IDT’s systems infringed claims 57 and 58 of U.S. Patent No. 6,000,608 (“the '608 patent”), and that these claims were not invalid. Plaintiff Alexsam, Inc. cross-appeals from the court’s judgment determining that certain other systems were licensed under claims 57 and 58 of the '608 patent.
We affirm the judgment of no invalidity. We reverse the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Estate of Sanford v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Alexsam, Inc. v. Aetna, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
- Asia Vital Components Co., Ltd. v. Asetek Danmark A/SDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Joao Control & Monitoring Systems, LLC v. Telular Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Ameritox, Ltd. v. Millennium Health, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2015
- Radware, Ltd. v. F5 Networks, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.