State v. Ferrell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
We have held in a number of cases that no appeal lies to this Court from a discretionary determination of an application for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. S. v. Edwards, 205 N. C., 661; S. v. Riddle and Huffman, 205 N. C., 591; S. v. Lea, 203 N. C., 316, 166 S. E., 292; S. v. Skipman, 203 N. C., 325, 166 S. E., 298; S. v. Davis, 203 N. C., 327, 166 S. E., 297; S. v. Rhodes, *739203 N. C., 329, 166 S. E., 299; S. v. Moore, 202 N. C., 841, 163 S. E., 700; S. v. Griffin, 202 N. C., 517, 163 S.E., 457; S. v. Cox, 202 N. C., 378, 162 S. E., 907; S. v. Lambert, 93 N. C.,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. . CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- State v. . LambertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- Carson v. . DellingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Holmes, Ex'r v. . GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. HammockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975