Legal Opinion

State v. Hammock

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1975No. 7413SC1036Published

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendant contends Judge Canaday abused his discretion and erred as a matter of law in denying his motion for a new trial on the grounds of newly discovered evidence. Appeal does not lie from a refusal to grant a new trial for newly discovered evidence. State v. Shelton, 21 N.C. App. 662, 205 S.E. 2d 316 (1974) ; State v. Gordon, 15 N.C. App. 241, 189 S.E. 2d 550 (1972) ; State v. Thomas, 227 N.C. 71, 40 S.E. 2d 412 (1946) ; State v. Ferrell, 206 N.C. 738, 175 S.E. 91 (1934). We have, however, treated defendant’s appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari, which is allowed.

G.S.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. State v. . FerrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. State v. FerrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API