Holland v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAVIS, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff Tim Holland filed this action alleging employment discrimination. Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company (UPRR) successfully moved for summary judgment. In his timely appeal from the ensuing judgment, plaintiff first contends that the court commissioner who heard the motion lacked jurisdiction as a judge pro tempore over the matter. In the interests of judicial economy, we decline to reach the issue because the substantive issue will only return to us after remand. On the merits, he asserts that his failure to file a timely, verified administrative…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Richards v. CH2M Hill, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Robert Rodriguez v. Airborne ExpressCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Accardi v. SUPERIOR COURT OF VENTURA CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jazayeri v. MaoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- O.W.L. Foundation v. City of Rohnert ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Cornejo v. LightbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Tumbling v. Merced Irrigation DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Guyton v. Novo Nordisk, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.