Legal Opinion
Guyton v. Novo Nordisk, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided December 16, 2015No. CASE NO. CV 15-00009 MMM (AGRx)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S' ” MOTION FOR SUMMARY t JUDGMENT
MARGARET M. MORROW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
On September 5, 2014, Andrew Guyton sued Novo Nordisk, Inc. (“Novo Nordisk”) and various fictitious defendants, alleging claims of race and age. discrimination, as well as retaliation, under California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act, Government Code § 12900 et seq. (“FEHA”); he also pled a claim for-wrongful discharge in violation of public policy.1 Novo Nordisk was served on December 5, 2014,2 and timely removed the action to federal court on January 2, 2015, invoking the court’s…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cook v. Board of Trustees of CSUDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Del Villar v. Transdev Services, IncDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019
- Peoples v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.District Court, D. Nevada · 2025