Legal Opinion
Robert Rodriguez v. Airborne Express
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 12, 2001No. 99-17350PublishedCited by 128 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Robert Rodriguez brought this action against Defendant Airborne Express (“Airborne”) for discrimination based on disability in violation of California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”). After removing the case to federal court on the ground of diversity of citizenship, Airborne moved for summary judgment. The district court granted the motion, dismissing Rodriguez’s action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies under FEPIA. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse the summary judgment and remand for further proceedings to…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Christine Evans v. Technologies Applications & Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Celia SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD BRANDS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Ashley Hunt Greenwood v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by128 opinions
- Joshua Liam Josephs, AKA Joshua Liam Joesphs, Joshua Liam Josepths v. Pacific Bell, Does, 1-30, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. $133,420.00 in United States CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Marshall v. Honeywell Technology Solutions, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Wills v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Ayala v. Frito Lay, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2017
123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.