Mortkowitz v. Texaco Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
INFANTE, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In this action property owners Michael and Maria Mortkowitz allege that their former tenant, Texaco, Inc. caused serious gasoline fuel contamination to their property while maintaining and operating a gasoline station on the property. Defendant seeks partial summary judgment as to seven of Plaintiffs’ nine claims primarily on the grounds that the claims are barred by the applicable statutes of limitations. 1
The motion was heard on December 13, 1993. Having…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc., William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Kendall Sherman and Arthur Sherman, Jr. v. Fred H. HallbauerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Day v. LSI Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 2016
- California v. Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.District Court, S.D. California · 2016
- Taylor v. QuallDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
- Phoenix Solutions, Inc. v. Sony Electronics, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2009
- Agri-Mark, Inc. v. Niro, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.