Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Quall
District Court, C.D. California
Decided January 29, 2007No. CV 06-5266PAMANXPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS — COURT ORDER
ANDERSON, District Judge.
Before the Court are a Motion to Strike Certain Portions of Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint (Docket No. 26) and a Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 29) filed by defendants Matthew Quail, Lang, Richert & Patch, and Unifund CCR Partners (collectively, “Defendants”). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78 and Local Rule 7-15, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for decision without oral argument. The hearing calendared for January 29, 2007, is continued to March 5, 2007, at 1:30 p.m. in accordance with…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sammy Lee Terrell v. R.D. Brewer, Warden Jon Morales Christopher C. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Fantasy, Inc. v. FogertyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Monaco v. Bear Stearns Residential Mortgage Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
- Moritz v. Daniel N. Gordon, P.C.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
- Multimedia Patent Trust v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2007
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Frederick J. Hanna & Associates, P.C.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2015
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Frederick J. Hanna & Associates, P.C.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.