United States v. Richard Elam
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
After failing to appeal either his conviction or sentence, Richard Elam moved for a special discovery hearing concerning the adequacy of trial counsel's representation. The district court denied the request and declined to recharacterize the discovery motion as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Because the court erred in failing to recharacterize, we vacate and remand.
I
In March 2016, Elam agreed to plead guilty of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2012). As part of the agreement, Elam…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Castro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Lonchar v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hernandez v. ThalerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Spotville v. CainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. CardenasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022
- Grant v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.