Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard Elam

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 15, 2019No. 18-10276PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

After failing to appeal either his conviction or sentence, Richard Elam moved for a special discovery hearing concerning the adequacy of trial counsel's representation. The district court denied the request and declined to recharacterize the discovery motion as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Because the court erred in failing to recharacterize, we vacate and remand.

I

In March 2016, Elam agreed to plead guilty of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2012). As part of the agreement, Elam…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Castro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Lonchar v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Hernandez v. ThalerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  4. Spotville v. CainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. CardenasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  2. Brown v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022
  3. Brown v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022
  4. Brown v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022
  5. Grant v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API