Hernandez v. Thaler
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
In substance, petitioner-appellant Alfred Hernandez seeks a certificate of appealability (a “COA”) granting him permission to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion for relief from judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6). The judgment in question applied the then-controlling rule of Salinas v. Dretke 1 and dismissed Hernandez’s habeas petition as barred by limitations. Hernandez argues that if the district court had applied the rule announced in Jimenez v. Quarter-man, 2 it would have determined that his petition was timely filed. On this point, Hernandez is right.…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by276 opinions
- Jermont Cox v. Martin HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Beunka Adams v. Rick Thaler, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Arturo Diaz v. William Stephens, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Bannon v. University of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Wallace v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
271 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.