Legal Opinion

Richard v. Federal Cartridge Corp.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 6, 1944No. 33,670PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Chief Justice.

Certiorari to review a determination by the director of the divi•sion of employment and security that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits under the unemployment compensation law. ■nifl.ima.Tit. was first disqualified by a claims examiner under Minn. St. 1941, § 268.09(1), (Mason St. 1941 Supp. § 4337-27[l]), on the .ground that he voluntarily and without good cause discontinued his work. An appeal was taken to an appeal tribunal, as provided by ■statute, and an order was made setting aside the determination of •the claims examiner but disqualifying claimant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chellson v. State Division of Employment & SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Lading v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  3. Bowman v. Troy Launderers & Cleaners, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. Engsell v. Northern Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  5. Tomhave v. GalenaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hamlin v. the Coolerator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Honeymead Products Co. v. ChristgauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Minnesota State Federation of Labor v. Land O' Lakes Creameries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API