Legal Opinion

Chellson v. State Division of Employment & Security

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 19, 1943No. 33,354PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hilton, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the director of the division of employment and security, hereinafter called the division, determining certain total unemployment benefits available to Esther P. Chellson, the claimant, under the state employment and security act. Claimant filed her initial petition for benefits on September 25, 1941. Upon notification that her total available benefits allowed by the division were $196 and that her weekly benefit rate was $14, her employer, the appellant here, protested, alleging that claimant left her employment voluntarily and without good…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pocahontas Mining Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State Ex Rel. Rockwell v. State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. Margenovitch v. Newport Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Jarman v. Collins-Hill Lumber & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1939

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Nyberg v. R. N. Cardozo & Brother, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Di Re v. Central Livestock Order Buying Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. Tester v. Jefferson LinesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Oliver Iron Mining Co. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  5. Stronge & Lightner Co. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API