Legal Opinion

United States v. Phillip R. White

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 14, 1989No. 89-1280PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

Section 1014 of the federal criminal code provides so far as relevant to this case that “whoever knowingly makes any false statement ... for the purpose of influencing in any way the action of ... any bank the deposits of which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation” shall be guilty of a felony. 18 U.S.C. § 1014. Phillip White was convicted of having violated this statute by making knowingly false statements to American Fletcher Leasing Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of American Fletcher National Bank, which is a bank whose deposits are insured…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Rose v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Waldron v. McAteeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. Richard A. GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. Albert B. BowmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. Don C. Davis, United States of America v. Daniel M. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  2. State v. WinotSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. United States v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Kucharek v. HanawayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. State v. CaddyNebraska Supreme Court · 2001

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API