Legal Opinion
United States v. Bennett
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 10, 2010No. 06-50580PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WARDLAW, Circuit Judge:
It is a federal crime knowingly to execute, or attempt to execute, a scheme or artifice “(1) to defraud a financial institution; or (2) to obtain any of the moneys, funds, credits, assets, securities, or other property owned by, or under the custody or control of, a financial institution, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises.” 18 U.S.C. § 1344. “Financial institution” is defined, as relevant to this appeal, as any bank or savings association the deposits of which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”).…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Miles v. Apex Marine Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. BrandonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Dole Food Co. v. PatricksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- United States v. Angela AguilarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. LindseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. RizkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. IrvinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Pamela Brennan v. Concord Efs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.