Morse v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Judge.
Following a bench trial on stipulated facts, the trial court found William Conrad Morse guilty of seven counts of theft by receiving stolen property. Morse appeals, asserting that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. He also argues that the trial court improperly admitted into evidence his pretrial statements to police. For reasons that follow, we affirm.
1. The parties do not dispute the facts found by the trial court. And where, as here, the facts involved in a motion to suppress are undisputed, we review the trial court’s application of law to those facts…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mangrum v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- ABERCROMBIE v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.