Ozvath v. Buckeye Union Insurance
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Froelich, Judge.
{¶ 1} This appeal arises out of a dispute between Charles Ozvath and Buckeye Union Insurance Company over whether Buckeye (now Continental Insurance Company) was required to defend Ozvath in a collection action filed by Robert Harbin and the extent to which Buckeye was required to reimburse Ozvath for his attorney fees and settlement costs. By way of summary judgment, the trial court found that Continental (the successor by merger with Buckeye) had a duty to defend Ozvath in the collection action, but did not have to indemnify Ozvath for the amount he paid in a settlement with…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Koos v. Central Ohio Cellular, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Ward v. United Foundries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
- Abroms v. Synergy Bldg. Sys.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.