Legal Opinion

Hiznay v. Strange

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided April 29, 1980PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LONGOBARDI, Judge.

In this medical malpractice action Defendant has moved for summary judgment on the basis that the action is barred by the applicable statute of limitations, 18 Del.C. 6856. 1 Following oral argument, the Court issued an opinion on February 20, 1980 allowing Plaintiffs twenty days to: (1) supplement the factual record concerning the date or dates on which the alleged malpractice occurred, and (2) amend their complaint to clearly raise the fraudulent concealment doctrine. Pending a response from Plaintiffs’ counsel, the Court held Defendant’s motion in abeyance. More than…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Layton v. AllenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
  2. Dunn v. St. Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  3. Halpern v. BarranCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1973
  4. Bailey v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  5. Collins v. Wilmington Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Geisz v. Greater Baltimore Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  2. Sheppard v. A.C. & S. Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1985
  3. Lecates v. Hertrich Pontiac Buick Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1986
  4. Reyes v. Kent General Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  5. Sellon v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API