Legal Opinion
TransWeb, LLC v. 3M Innovative Properties Co.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 10, 2016No. 2014-1646PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUGHES, Circuit Judge.
3M sued TransWeb for infringement of several patents. TransWeb sued for declaratory judgment of invalidity and non-infringement of the patents. A jury found the patents to be invalid based on Tran-sWeb’s prior public use of the patented method. In accordance with an advisory verdict from the jury, the district court found the patents unenforceable due to inequitable conduct. The jury also found 3M to be liable for a Walker Process antitrust violation and that attorney fees were an appropriate antitrust remedy. The district court awarded approximately $26 million to…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- In Re Lipitor Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Amgen Inc. v. Hospira, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Click-To-Call Technologies, Lp v. Ingenio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Inline Packaging, LLC v. Graphic Packaging Int'l, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
- Nobel Biocare Services Ag v. Instradent USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.