Legal Opinion
Click-To-Call Technologies, Lp v. Ingenio, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 16, 2018No. 2015-1242PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion concurring in footnote 3 of the opinion filed by Circuit Judge Taranto.
Opinion dissenting from footnote 3 of the opinion filed by Circuit Judge Dyk, in which Circuit Judge Lourie joins.
O'Malley, Circuit Judge.
This long-marooned case returns to us after a voyage alongside two others interpreting the scope of 35 U.S.C. § 314(d)'s "No Appeal" provision and its applicability to time-bar determinations under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) : Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. Lee , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 2131, 195 L.Ed.2d 423 (2016), and Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corp. , 878 F.3d 1364 (Fed. Cir.…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Thryv, Inc. v. Click-To-Call Technologies, LPSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Game and Technology Co., Ltd. v. Wargaming Group LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. v. F'real Foods, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Facebook, Inc. v. Windy City Innovations, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Power Integrations, Inc. v. Semiconductor Components Indus., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.