Legal Opinion

Matter of EES Lambert Associates

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 18, 1986No. 84 B 591, 84 C 8003PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DECKER, District Judge.

In this bankruptcy appeal, EES Lambert (“Lambert”) seeks reversal of the bankruptcy court’s decision ordering restoration of certain attorneys fees to the bankrupt’s estate. In re EES Lambert, 43 B.R. 689 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1984). Specifically, the court ordered restoration of a $20,500 legal fee paid to Hannafan & Handler for its defense of the successful foreclosure action brought by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), and a $25,-000 pre-petition retainer paid to Schwartz & Freedman for its representation in the bankruptcy…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  2. In Re EES Lambert AssociatesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
  3. In Re TWO-KMF Development Ass'nUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Indian Motocycle Associates III Ltd. Partnership v. Massachusetts Housing Finance AgencyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Berk & BerkDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
  3. In Re EES Lambert AssociatesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
  4. Matter of Tampa Bay Briarwood Associates Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1990
  5. In Re RLA of Madison, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API