Legal Opinion
United States v. Berk & Berk
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 2, 1991No. Civ. A. 89-4577 (JCL)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LIFLAND, District Judge.
The United States of America moves for partial summary judgment on its claim for the appointment of a receiver. In addition, the United States moves to dismiss defendant’s counterclaims and to strike its jury demand. Third-Party Defendant, York Associates, Inc. (“York”), moves to dismiss the third-party complaint. Defendant Berk & Berk (“Berk”) opposes the motions. The court will address all motions on the papers pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 78.
BACKGROUND
In 1985, Berk purchased Hunters Glen Apartments, an apartment project, with funds loaned by DRG…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. JonesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. CCC Atlantic, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
- United States v. HarveyDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1998
- LEASETEC v. Inhabitants of County of CumberlandDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1995
- National State Bank v. GonzalezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.