Legal Opinion

Frances v. Monongahela Railway Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1927No. Appeal 202PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, P. J.,

The plaintiff in his statement of the cause of action averred that a Ford car which he owned was being driven by his employe over a grade crossing of the track of the defendant company when a train operated by the employes of the defendant company collided with the said automobile, slightly damaging same; that before any material damage was done to said automobile the train was brought to a stop and the automobile (hereinafter designated as the car) inspected by the driver; and the driver requested the train crew to assist him in removing the car from the tracks; that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bunting v. HogsettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  2. Beck v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Forrest v. BuchananSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  4. Atlantic Refining Co. v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rice v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Smith, Jr. Et Ux. v. BlafkinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Schoenberger v. JamesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Gethins v. SteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API