Frances v. Monongahela Railway Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Porter, P. J.,
The plaintiff in his statement of the cause of action averred that a Ford car which he owned was being driven by his employe over a grade crossing of the track of the defendant company when a train operated by the employes of the defendant company collided with the said automobile, slightly damaging same; that before any material damage was done to said automobile the train was brought to a stop and the automobile (hereinafter designated as the car) inspected by the driver; and the driver requested the train crew to assist him in removing the car from the tracks; that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bunting v. HogsettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Beck v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Forrest v. BuchananSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Atlantic Refining Co. v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rice v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Smith, Jr. Et Ux. v. BlafkinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Schoenberger v. JamesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Gethins v. SteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941