Legal Opinion

Schoenberger v. James

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 19, 1931No. Appeal 15PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baedbige, J.,

The plaintiff, a subcontractor, sued the defendant, to recover a balance alleged to be due under a contract whereby he was to haul earth excavated by the defendant, who had a principal contract with the borough of Westmont. The contract provided that the plaintiff was to haul and remove the earth for the price of 24 cents per cubic yard, and dump it at points designated by the borough engineer. He was “to be paid when the party of the first part has received his estimate from the borough engineer.”

The plaintiff claimed that he hauled, under this contract, 20,872 cubic…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lalor v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Beck v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Crowley v. SnellenburgSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Greenlee v. WestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  5. Vogler v. Harrisburg Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Friedman v. Parkway Baking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Gethins v. SteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Brick v. Kapner, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API