Legal Opinion

Moe v. Steenberg

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 30, 1966No. 40140-1PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

Plaintiff seeks damages for injuries she sustained when defendant collided with her while ice skating. The jury returned a verdict for defendant and plaintiff appeals from an order denying her motion for a new trial. The issue is whether the trial court erred in submitting the defense of assumption of risk.

Plaintiff’s injury occurred on the evening of New Year’s Day 1962 when she and her family were skating with defendant’s family on an outdoor public rink in Running Park, Bloomington. At the time of the accident plaintiff was 35 years of age. She had begun skating when she was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schamel v. St. Louis Arena CorporationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Diker v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. McCullough ex rel. McCullough v. Omaha Coliseum Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Benoit v. MarvinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
  5. Hollinbeck v. DowneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Staten v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Wagner v. Thomas J. Obert EnterprisesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. David J. Dillworth Dorothy Dillworth v. Andrew GambardellaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  5. Auckenthaler v. GrundmeyerNevada Supreme Court · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API