Legal Opinion

Luke v. City of Anoka

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 26, 1967No. 39634PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

The singular issues of the liability based on negligence of each defendant for damages to plaintiffs arising out of a motor vehicle accident were jointly tried and submitted to a jury. By general verdicts, the jury found defendant City of Anoka liable and defendants Anoka Halloween, Inc., and Estate of Otto Erickson, deceased, not liable. Subsequently, in response to multiple motions by plaintiffs for judgment n. o. v. or a new trial against Anoka Halloween and for a new trial against the administrator of the Erickson estate, and motions by defendant city for judgment n.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Spanel v. Mounds View School District No. 621Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. Johnston v. City of East MolineIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  3. O'HARE v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Auslander v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  5. MacK v. McGrathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Flom v. FlomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Hansen v. City of Saint PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. Soo Line Railroad Company v. Werner EnterprisesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  4. Stratioti v. BickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  5. Henkel v. HolmCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API