Legal Opinion

United States v. Sanchez

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 12, 2014No. 13-8088UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

MICHAEL R. MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

On September 23, 2013, Appellant Raymond Duane Sanchez filed a pro se pleading styled “Petition for Redress of Grievance.” Relying on Alleyne v. United States, — U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 2151, 186 L.Ed.2d 314 (2013), Sanchez collaterally challenged the mandatory minimum…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Full Life Hospice, LLC v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. Caravalho v. PughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Charles R. Getz, Jr. v. Brian Emig, Warden, and Attorney General of the State of DelawareDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2026
  2. Sipple v. ZevitzDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2023
  3. Valles v. HansenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API