United States v. John Francis Rourke
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
In 1985, defendant-appellant John Francis Rourke was sentenced under 21 U.S.C. § 960(b)(1) to a prison term of thirteen years after pleading guilty to various drug-related offenses and to filing a false tax return. At the guilty plea proceeding, the district court explained to Rourke that he would be subject .to a mandatory special parole term of at least three years under section 960(b)(1) as a result of his guilty plea to violating 21 U.S.C. § 952(a). Rourke subsequently challenged his convictions, his sentence, and the denial of parole.. We addressed those claims in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Paul C. "Paulie" VillanoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Edward Bontkowski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. William Michael FurmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. WindrixCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- State v. Van LehmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
- United States v. GuerreroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.