Legal Opinion

McEachern v. Brackett

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1894No. 1178PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Superior Cowrt, King Cownty.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

— Appellant, in 1883, bought from respondent Brackett a parcel of land in King county, at the price of $650, of which sum $300 was paid by note secured by mortgage, and the-balance in cash. The note and mortgage were transferred twice, so that respondent Brautigam was the holder thereof in August, 1884, and respondents *653Phinney and Leary were endorser for value and accommodation endorser, respectively. At the date last mentioned, which was after the maturity of the note, Brautigam commenced a foreclosure action, making appellant and the other…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shelton v. TiffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  2. Harshey v. BlackmarrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  3. Newcomb v. DeweySupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
  4. Glass v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Vilas v. Plattsburgh & Montreal RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Harper v. City of Wichita FallsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. Horton v. Donohoe Kelly Banking Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Frisbee v. CoburnMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Wise v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Weiser v. HolzmanWashington Supreme Court · 1903

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API