Moreno v. Gonzalez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Moreno’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition raised seven claims. According to the record before us, Moreno never fairly presented any of these claims to the Arizona Supreme Court.
We must determine whether a rule of state law, which the state courts apply consistently, would necessarily bar Moreno from fairly presenting his claims to the state courts at this date. If so, then absent cause and prejudice or a fundamental miscarriage of justice, federal review of these claims would be *410barred. See Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 750, 111 S.Ct. 2546, 2565, 115 L.Ed.2d 640 (1991); Johnson v. Lewis, 929…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Dugger v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Michael Ponce Tacho v. Joe MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- John David Roettgen v. Dale Copeland, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Shumway v. PayneWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Jerome Powell v. John LambertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Date v. SchriroDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2008
- Van Norman v. SchriroDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2007
- (HC) Trotter v. Superior Court of California, Calaveras CountyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.