Conrad v. Cummer-Diggins Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.
The Cummer-Diggins Company is engaged in the business of manufacturing lumber and other products in the city of Cadillac, Michigan. In connection with its other business it operates a chemical plant in which it uses a large amount of 4-foot wood. This wood is. cut and loaded on cars in the woods and hauled to Cadillac over a logging railroad owned and operated by the company. On the 3d day of May, 1922, Waddy Conrad, father of the plaintiffs, was engaged in loading this wood on defendant’s cars for a stipulated price of $1.50 per car. While attempting to block one of the loaded cars, which…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gall v. Detroit Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Tuttle v. Embury-Martin Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Carleton v. Foundry & Machine Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Zoltowski v. Ternes Coal & Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Van Simaeys v. George R. Cook Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dennis v. Sinclair Lumber & Fuel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Polka v. Lynch Timber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Cooper v. Interstate Motor Freight Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Begovac v. Northwestern Cooperage & Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Industrial Commission v. Employers Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.