Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Interstate Motor Freight Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1933No. Docket No. 91, Calendar No. 36,823PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Defendant, Interstate Motor Freight Company, a Michigan corporation, transports freight by motor trucks to various .points in Michigan and nearby States. It sold a-motor truck on contract to one Joseph Cesiel and, coincident thereto, gave him a “hauling contract” for a term of 18 months, some of the important provisions of which, were as follows: Cesiel agreed to transport freight for defendant as a contractor and not as an employee; he was to haul and distribute freight to all points designated by defendant by motor truck and trailer, to be equipped with tarpaulins large enough to protect…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gall v. Detroit Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Tuttle v. Embury-Martin Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Baxter v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Dennis v. Sinclair Lumber & Fuel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Van Simaeys v. George R. Cook Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Laughlin v. Michigan Motor Freight LinesMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Sliter v. CobbMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Irwin v. Williamson Candy Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Lewis v. SummersMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Sliter v. CobbMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API