Solomon v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLFSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ronald Solomon (“Plaintiff’ or “Mr. Solomon”) brings the instant suit against Defendants, Bristol Myers-Squibb Company (“BMS”), Sanofi-Aventis U.S., L.L.C., Sanofi-Aventis U.S., Inc., and Sanofi-Synthelabo, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging that he suffered injuries as a result of Defendants’ design, development, manufacture, testing, packaging, promoting, marketing, distributing, labeling and sale of their prescription drug Plavix, an anti-clotting medication. Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (“Amended Complaint”) asserts various Texas state and…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ford Motor Co. v. RidgwayTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. NicastroSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McKay v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2013
- Parkinson v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- Moncibaiz v. Pfizer IncDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2021