Cochran v. National Casualty Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.
Plaintiff had verdict of a jury and judgment in suit on a health and accident insurance policy. Defendant contends the court should have directed a verdict in its favor. This being the only claim of error, the facts must be taken most favorably to plaintiff.
Clarence Wilfong, defendant’s agent to solicit policies and collect premiums, solicited plaintiff’s policy, which was issued January 30, 1928. He told plaintiff he would call for the premiums every month. He or his representative called at plaintiff’s home and collected premiums for over three years.
In May, 1929, plaintiff sustained a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Leeson v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Fenton v. National Fire Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Baker v. Michigan Mutual Protective Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- People ex rel. Zeeland Brick Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Henderson v. Grand Rapids Accident & Health InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rosario v. Atlantic Southern Ins.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1968
- Adell Broadcasting Corp. v. Apex Media Sales, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Aston v. ElkowMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Federal Life Ins. v. RumpelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- Barag, Admr. v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.