Legal Opinion
Henderson v. Grand Rapids Accident & Health Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided November 5, 1907No. Docket No. 114PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Error to Kent; Wolcott, J. Assumpsit by Mary E. Henderson against the Grand Rapids Accident & Health Insurance Company on a policy of insurance. There was judgment for plaintiff, and .defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
The facts in Baker v. Protective Ass’n, 118 Mich. 431, are so similar to those in this case as to render a statement unnecessary. This case is ruled by that against the contention of the defendant, and the judgment is affirmed.
Blair, Montgomery, Ostrander, and Hooker, JJ., .concurred.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Baker v. Michigan Mutual Protective Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cochran v. National Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933