Legal Opinion

Hancock v. Northcutt

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1991No. S-3470, S-3483PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

This case involves a dispute between the owner-builders of an earth-sheltered concrete house, Carol and Melvin Northcutt, and the concrete contractors for the house, Herb and Marge Hancock. The house consists of seven joined pods which may be covered with dirt for insulation. The Northcutts made an oral contract with the Hancocks for construction of the pods. The terms of the contract are in dispute. The Northcutts claim that for $65,000 the Hancocks agreed to complete all structural concrete work. The Hancocks dispute the original price,…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Rodrigues v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Meyer v. NottgerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  3. Stewart v. RudnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. B & M HOMES, INC. v. HoganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  5. Chelini v. NieriCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Erlich v. MenezesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Chizmar v. MacKieAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Beckie Price v. High Pointe Oil Co IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Breck v. MooreAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Kallstrom v. United StatesAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API