Legal Opinion

Monsanto Company v. Scruggs

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided August 16, 2006No. 2004-1532PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

459 F.3d 1328

MONSANTO COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Mitchell SCRUGGS, Eddie Scruggs, Scruggs Farm & Supplies, LLC, Scruggs Farm Joint Venture, HES Farms, Inc., MES Farms, Inc., and MHS Farms, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 04-1532, 05-1120, 04-1121.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

August 16, 2006.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Seth P. Waxman, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief was Paul R.Q. Wolfson. Of counsel on the brief was Joseph C. Orlet, Husch & Eppenberger, LLC, of St.…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. Indiana Federation of DentistsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mercexchange, L.L.C. v. Ebay, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API