Legal Opinion
Heery International, Inc. v. Montgomery County
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 6, 2004No. 15, September Term, 2004PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARRELL, Judge.
This case represents an initiative by Heery International, Inc. (“Heery International”) and Hellmuth, Obata & Kassab-aum, P.C. (“HOK”) (sometimes collectively referred to as “Heery”) to circumvent Montgomery County’s (the “County”) administrative dispute resolution process for claims relating to local public works contracts. They seek to truncate that process on the ground that the process and the County’s designated administrative adjudicator are “palpably without jurisdiction” to decide the particular dispute in this case. Heery shall not succeed.
I
On 1 December 1989, Heery…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- West v. BerglandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Converge Services Group, LLC v. CurranCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Soley v. State Commission on Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Maryland Commission on Human Relations v. Mass Transit AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- County Commissioners for Carroll County v. Forty West Builders, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Doe v. Montgomery County Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Rockwood Casualty Insurance v. Uninsured Employers' FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Anderson House, LLC v. Mayor of RockvilleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.