Legal Opinion

Erlandson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 15, 1988No. B14-87-323-CR, C14-87-417-CR, C14-87-423-CR and 14-87-424-CRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ELLIS, Justice.

This is a trespass case. TEX.PENAL CODE ANN. § 30.05 (Vernon Supp.1988). Appellants Paul Erlandson, Ben Charleston Huggins, Franklin S. Lee and Steven Xav-ior Hawley firmly believe that abortion is murder. In an attempt to stop the abortion procedures to be performed on December 13, 1986 at a women’s clinic located in Harris County, the appellants intentionally trespassed at the clinic. The jury rejected appellants’ not guilty pleas and assessed each appellant a one hundred and eighty day jail sentence and a $500 fine. The court probated the sentences on the jury’s…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Elam v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Egger v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1991
  4. Chunn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
  5. State v. O'BRIENMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API