Legal Opinion

Chunn v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided December 19, 1991No. 01-90-01120-CRPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHEN, Justice.

A jury found appellant guilty of criminal trespass and assessed punishment at a fine of $1,000.00 and 24 days in jail.

The first point of error contends the trial court erred by not instructing the jury on the defense of necessity. Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 9.22 (Vernon 1974). Appellant and three juveniles trespassed at a medical clinic that performed abortions. Appellant contends his trespass was necessary to defend the other trespassers from attack by people in the clinic.

This point of error is without merit for two reasons. First, appellant did not admit at trial that he…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Gibson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Farris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Bobo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mills v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  2. Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
  3. State v. MendietaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  4. Arturo Lopez v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2023
  5. Damon Keith Hunter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API