Legal Opinion

Elam v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 18, 1992No. 3-91-188-CRPublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ONION, Justice (Assigned).

Appellant Elam appeals her conviction for criminal trespass. Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 30.05 (West 1989 & Supp.1992). After the jury found appellant guilty, the trial court assessed her punishment at confinement in the county jail for forty-five days.

Appellant advances five points of error. First, appellant contends that the trial court was disqualified from sitting because of an inflammatory newspaper advertisement by the Texas Abortion Rights Action League “showing a disqualifying interest in the case and sufficient bias to require recusal.” Second, appellant contends…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Vanderbilt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Gamez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. McClenan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Beck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Ortiz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  2. Stafford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1997
  3. Ford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1994
  4. Sheridan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Bryson Lee McClinton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API