Legal Opinion

Galvin Et Ux. v. Kreider Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 21, 1928No. Appeal, 12PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

While one of the plaintiffs was walking along a public street, she was struck and seriously injured by an automobile belonging to and being operated by Donald Fager, who is not a party to this action. The injured woman and her husband sued the present defendants, who also are husband and wife, upon the theory that the injury was caused by the concurrent, negligence of the wife and Fager. The jury decided against the wife alone, the court in banc entered judgment non obstante veredicto in her favor, and plaintiffs appeal, alleging only the entry of that judgment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alperdt Et Ux. v. PaigeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Cubitt v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Zotter v. Lehigh Talley R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Sullivan v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Craft v. HinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hostetler v. KniseleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Meads Et Ux. v. RutterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Stuckwish v. Hagan Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Barrett v. Abe BassSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Costack v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API