Legal Opinion

Cubitt v. New York Central Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1924No. Appeal, No. 153PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

The plant of the Atlantic Refining Company between Oil City and Franklin covers a large tract of *368ground, upon which various buildings have been constructed. Under an agreement, the New York Central Railroad installed a siding, connecting its main track on the east with the powerhouse of the refinery, located to the west. Coal cars were transported over it, — usually between four and five o’clock in the afternoon, — and the making of the daily movement was known to the workmen engaged on the premises. A train was pushed in on June 23, 1922, at the regular hour,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Lessig v. Reading Transit & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Holzheimer v. Lit Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Chapman v. ClothierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Zandt v. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Anspach v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Hartig v. American Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Kindt v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Grimes v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Hawk v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Jones v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API