Legal Opinion

Stuckwish v. Hagan Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1934No. Appeals, 148-150PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

Audrey Gf. Stuckwish, eight years of age, was injured by the defendant, Smith, December 12, 1930, at 4:30 p. m. She and her parents brought this suit against Smith, driver of the automobile, and the Hagan Corporation, his employer. By scire facias, Burns and Weir, a copartnership trading as Central Garage, were added as defendants. A nonsuit was entered as to Hagan Corporation, an order of which no complaint is made. Verdicts for plaintiffs were rendered against the remaining defendants. Judgment on the verdict was entered against Smith, but the other defendants’…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roden v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  2. O'Malley v. Laurel Line Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Zotter v. Lehigh Talley R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Anspach v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. Henry v. S. Liebovitz & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. JOHNSON v. ANGRETTISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Cartwright v. GravesTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Reilly v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. White v. . ChappellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Pendarvis v. PfeiferSupreme Court of Florida · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API