Legal Opinion

In re Rio Grande Valley Gas Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1999No. 99-1067PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice HECHT, joined by Justice OWEN,

dissenting from the denial of the petitions for writ of mandamus.

These two petitions for mandamus raise an important question about the scope of local court rules — rules adopted by a majority of the district or county judges in a county,1 and sometimes by individual judges.2 The question is this: can local court rules authorize the transfer of a case from one court to another in the same county when the transfer would (a) circumvent the procedure prescribed by statute and by state court rules for determining whether the presiding judge of the court from…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. European Crossroads' Shopping Center, Ltd. v. Criswell, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1995
  2. McLeod v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Starnes v. Holloway, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  4. In Re Rio Grande Valley Gas Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
  5. Rio Grande Valley Gas Co. v. City of Pharr, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. in Re: Kerry Max Cook, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2012
  2. Hotze v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
  3. Bruce R. Hotze and Paul Bettencourt v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
  4. Bruce R. Hotze and Paul Bettencourt v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
  5. Gerald E. Gilbert v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API