Hotze v. City of Houston
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JEFF ROSE, Justice.
This appeal arises from an expedited declaratory judgment action instituted by the City of Houston to validate an ordinance raising the City’s water and waste-water service rates. Appellants Bruce R. Hotze and Paul Bettencourt (collectively “Intervenors”) appeal from the district court’s judgment upholding the validity of the City’s ordinance and from the district court’s post-trial orders requiring Interve-nors to post a security bond and dismissing them from the case for failure to post the security bond. In three issues challenging the district court’s…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Bocquet v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- City of Rockwall v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. ShumakeTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- General Services Commission v. Little-Tex Insulation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cities Conroe v. Paxton (In re City of Conroe)Court of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- George Alejos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2014
- Ex Parte City of El Paso, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2018
- City of Conroe, Texas City of Magnolia, Texas And City of Splendora, Texas v. the Attorney General of Texas and San Jacinto River Authority, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2022
- City of Conroe, Texas City of Magnolia, Texas And City of Splendora, Texas v. the Attorney General of Texas and San Jacinto River Authority, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2022
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.