Legal Opinion

European Crossroads' Shopping Center, Ltd. v. Criswell

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 8, 1995No. 05-93-01771-CVPublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Justice.

This is the second appeal of this case. 2 On the second trial, the jury found Criswell had performed the services agreed upon in the parties’ contract. The jury also found thirty-five percent of Criswell's recovery as reasonable attorney’s fees for Criswell’s attorneys. The trial court entered judgment for the fee due under the contract, prejudgment interest at ten percent per year, and attorney’s fees based on the jury’s finding.

Crossroads contends there is no evidence or insufficient evidence to support the jury’s answers to the questions submitted in the jury charge.…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Anderson v. City of Seven PointsTexas Supreme Court · 1991

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Mathis v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  2. Texas Workers' Compensation Insurance Fund v. MandlbauerTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Indian Beach Property Owners' Ass'n v. Linden, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Middleton, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  5. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Martin, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API